Halwood v. Bedonie
This text of 4 Navajo Rptr. 72 (Halwood v. Bedonie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navajo Nation Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A review of the file of this matter for the purpose of making a determination of probable cause under 7 N.T.C. Sec. 801(b) discloses that the file does not contain a certified copy of the judgment or order being appealed. There is also no indication in the file that a motion for reconsideration was ever made in the District Court. Rule 2 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure requires the filing of a certified copy of the judgment or order attacked on appeal, and Rule 5(d) requires the filing of a motion for reconsideration. The appeal file should disclose the making of such a motion.
Due to noncompliance with the clear and easy Rules of Appellate Procedure, the above-entitled appeal is hereby dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Navajo Rptr. 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halwood-v-bedonie-navajoctapp-1983.