Halvorson v. Connors

34 N.W.2d 778, 253 Wis. 629, 1948 Wisc. LEXIS 424
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided October 12, 1948·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Fairchild, J.

The members of the court are equally divided upon this appeal. Mr. Justice Wickhem, Mr. Justice Hughes, and Mr. Justice Martin are of the opinion that' a new trial should be granted. Mr. Chief Justice Rosenberry, Mr. Justice Fritz, and the writer are of the opinion that the order should be reversed and judgment entered for plaintiff.

Under the rule the order appealed from is affirmed.

By the Court. — Order affirmed.

Broadfoot, J., took no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Halvorson v. Connors, 34 N.W.2d 778, 253 Wis. 629, 1948 Wisc. LEXIS 424 (Wis. 1948).

34 N.W.2d 778 (Halvorson v. Connors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott Smith v. Greg Kleynerman
2017 WI 22 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2017)