Haluska v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Haluska v. State

615 So. 2d 219, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2905, 1993 WL 55975

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 5, 1993

DocketNo. 92-1797

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 615 So. 2d 219 (Haluska v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haluska v. State, 615 So. 2d 219, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2905, 1993 WL 55975 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the offense of driving while license suspended, the defendant was sentenced to 364 days in county jail under section 322.-34(1), Florida Statutes (1991). That offense is a second degree misdemeanor which, under section 775.082(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), is punishable by a term of imprisonment not to exceed 60 days. Neither the defendant’s list of prior convictions nor the guidelines scoresheet discloses a prior conviction for driving with a suspended license. In the absence of evidence of record showing this was a second offense, the sentence exceeds the statutory maximum for a first offense. Therefore that sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for a new sentence within the statutory maximum.

The.other issues on appeal are without merit and are affirmed.

SENTENCE VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED.

PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., COWART, Judge, Retired, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

For the offense of driving while license suspended, the defendant was sentenced to 364 days in county jail under section 322.-34(1), Florida Statutes (1991). That offense is a second degree misdemeanor which, under section 775.082(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), is punishable by a term of imprisonment not to exceed 60 days. Neither the defendant’s list of prior convictions nor the guidelines scoresheet discloses a prior conviction for driving with a suspended license. In the absence of evidence of record showing this was a second offense, the sentence exceeds the statutory maximum for a first offense. Therefore that sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for a new sentence within the statutory maximum.

The.other issues on appeal are without merit and are affirmed.

SENTENCE VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED.

PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., COWART, Judge, Retired, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

615 So. 2d 219, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2905, 1993 WL 55975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haluska-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack