Haltzel v. Printz

110 A. 161, 267 Pa. 156, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 828
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 12, 1920·No. Appeal, No. 146·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from an order of the court below awarding a new trial on the ground that a verdict was returned for the plaintiff against the weight of the evidence. The case was twice tried. The verdict for the plaintiff on the first trial, for $9,472.05, was set aside as being against the weight of the evidence. On the second' trial the verdict for the plaintiff was for $24,504.65, and we are of one mind, from an examination of the record, that there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the court below in setting it aside and granting a new trial.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haltzel v. Printz, 110 A. 161, 267 Pa. 156, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 828 (Pa. 1920).

110 A. 161 (Haltzel v. Printz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Larimer, Trustee v. Cambria Co.
191 A. 646 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. Giacobello
121 A. 333 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)