Haltzel v. Printz

110 A. 161, 267 Pa. 156, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 828
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 12, 1920
DocketAppeal, No. 146
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 110 A. 161 (Haltzel v. Printz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haltzel v. Printz, 110 A. 161, 267 Pa. 156, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 828 (Pa. 1920).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from an order of the court below awarding a new trial on the ground that a verdict was returned for the plaintiff against the weight of the evidence. The case was twice tried. The verdict for the plaintiff on the first trial, for $9,472.05, was set aside as being against the weight of the evidence. On the second' trial the verdict for the plaintiff was for $24,504.65, and we are of one mind, from an examination of the record, that there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the court below in setting it aside and granting a new trial.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Larimer, Trustee v. Cambria Co.
191 A. 646 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. Giacobello
121 A. 333 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 A. 161, 267 Pa. 156, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haltzel-v-printz-pa-1920.