Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Haltiwanger v. Charlotte Amusement Co.

Haltiwanger v. Charlotte Amusement Co.

134 S.E.2d 198, 261 N.C. 180, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 438
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 17, 1964
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 134 S.E.2d 198 (Haltiwanger v. Charlotte Amusement Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haltiwanger v. Charlotte Amusement Co., 134 S.E.2d 198, 261 N.C. 180, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 438 (N.C. 1964).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff’s sole assignment of error brought forward and set out in her -brief is the -failure of the court to- -comply with the provisions of G.S. 1-180. The'facts -are not -complicated. We have examined the charge in its entirety and sufficient prejudicial error has not (been made to appear therein to justify a new trial.

The verdict and judgment below will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davison-Paxon Co. v. Archer
85 S.E.2d 182 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 S.E.2d 198, 261 N.C. 180, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haltiwanger-v-charlotte-amusement-co-nc-1964.