Home/Supreme Court of Arkansas/Halter v. State

Halter v. State

959 S.W.2d 55, 332 Ark. 77, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 116
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedFebruary 26, 1998
DocketCR 98-119
StatusPublished

This text of 959 S.W.2d 55 (Halter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Halter v. State, 959 S.W.2d 55, 332 Ark. 77, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 116 (Ark. 1998).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Rocky Halter, by his attorney, Darrell F. Brown, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 295 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)
Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
959 S.W.2d 55, 332 Ark. 77, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halter-v-state-ark-1998.