Halsted v. Oakland Bank of Savings

California Court of Appeal

Halsted v. Oakland Bank of Savings

36 Cal. App. 816

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 12, 1918

DocketCiv. No. 2301; Civ. No. 2303

StatusPublished

This text of 36 Cal. App. 816 (Halsted v. Oakland Bank of Savings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Halsted v. Oakland Bank of Savings, 36 Cal. App. 816 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

The facts of these two cases are such as to present the same question that we have this day decided in James D. Halsted et al. v. Central Savings Bank, ante, p. 500, [172 Pac. 613], numbered in this court No. 2302. In all the eases the plaintiffs, as executors of the last will of James M. Halsted, deceased, are seeking to establish an interest in certain savings bank deposits belonging to the deceased in his lifetime, but in which he had created an interest in favor of Anna N. Collins amounting upon his death to absolute and sole ownership.

Upon the authority of the above-mentioned case of Halsted et al. v. Central Savings Bank, No. 2302, the judgment in each of these cases is affirmed.

A petition to have the causes heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 9, 1918.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The facts of these two cases are such as to present the same question that we have this day decided in James D. Halsted et al. v. Central Savings Bank, ante, p. 500, [172 Pac. 613], numbered in this court No. 2302. In all the eases the plaintiffs, as executors of the last will of James M. Halsted, deceased, are seeking to establish an interest in certain savings bank deposits belonging to the deceased in his lifetime, but in which he had created an interest in favor of Anna N. Collins amounting upon his death to absolute and sole ownership.

Upon the authority of the above-mentioned case of Halsted et al. v. Central Savings Bank, No. 2302, the judgment in each of these cases is affirmed.

A petition to have the causes heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 9, 1918.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 Cal. App. 816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halsted-v-oakland-bank-of-savings-calctapp-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack