Halsted v. Oakland Bank of Savings

172 P. 614, 36 Cal. App. 816, 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 531
California Court of Appeal·Decided March 12, 1918·No. Civ. No. 2303. Civ. No. 2301.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The facts of these two cases are such as to present the same question that we have this day decided inJames D. Halsted et al. v. Central Savings Bank, ante, p. 500, [172 P. 613], numbered in this court No. 2302. In all the cases the plaintiffs, as executors of the last will of James M. Halsted, deceased, are seeking to establish an interest in certain savings bank deposits belonging to the deceased in his lifetime, but in which he had created an interest in favor of Anna N. Collins amounting upon his death to absolute and sole ownership.

Upon the authority of the above-mentioned case of Halsted etal. v. Central Savings Bank, No. 2302, the judgment in each of these cases is affirmed.

A petition to have the causes heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 9, 1918. *Page 817

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Halsted v. Oakland Bank of Savings, 172 P. 614, 36 Cal. App. 816, 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 531 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918).

172 P. 614 (Halsted v. Oakland Bank of Savings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Kellogg
107 P.2d 964 (California Court of Appeal, 1940)
Young v. Young
14 P.2d 580 (California Court of Appeal, 1932)