Halsted v. Halsted

Superior Court of New York

Halsted v. Halsted

23 N.Y.S. 191

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo·Decided May 1, 1893·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There were certain characteristics of the application below which justify the' decision that was made. It was uncertain that the letters "contained anything that would benefit the defendants, if offered as evidence. Indeed, the contents are undisclosed. The application does not avow specifically that the contents, if learned, will be offered in testimony upon the trial.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There were certain characteristics of the application below which justify the' decision that was made. It was uncertain that the letters "contained anything that would benefit the defendants, if offered as evidence. Indeed, the contents are undisclosed. The application does not avow specifically that the contents, if learned, will be offered in testimony upon the trial.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs.

Halsted v. Halsted, 23 N.Y.S. 191 (superctny 1893).

Pincite

23 N.Y.S. 191 (Halsted v. Halsted) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related