Halstead v. Manning

34 F. 565, 1888 U.S. App. LEXIS 2335
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided April 13, 1888·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Wallace, J.

The defendant raises by demurrer to the bill of complaint the objection that this court has not jurisdiction over the person of the defendant. The bill alleges the infringement by the defendant of letters patent of the United ¡-Stales granted to the complainant for a new and useful improvement in stewing kettles or boilers, and also alleges that the defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Connecticut, and doing business in the ¡Southern district of New York. Prior to the act of congress of March 3, 1887, the defendant could have been sued here, if “found” within the district, but that act has made a radical change in the former provisions of law respecting the jurisdiction of this court, and a defendant can no longer be sued outside the district of which he is an inhabitant, unless he consents, or waives his right to object, except where the jurisdiction of the»circuit court is founded only on the fact that the action is between citizens of different states. The present action does not fall within that category; and, as the facts showing want of jurisdiction appear upon the tace of the bill, and the defendant has not appeared generally in the action, but specially, in order to raise the objection by demurrer, the demurrer must he sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Halstead v. Manning, 34 F. 565, 1888 U.S. App. LEXIS 2335 (circtsdny 1888).

34 F. 565 (Halstead v. Manning) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.
315 U.S. 561 (Supreme Court, 1942)
Bacon v. Federal Reserve Bank
289 F. 513 (E.D. Washington, 1923)
Lewis Blind Stitch Co. v. Arbetter Felling Mach. Co.
181 F. 974 (U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois, 1910)
Long v. Long
73 F. 369 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa, 1896)
Union Switch & Signal Co. v. Hall Signal Co.
65 F. 625 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1895)