Halstead v. Gordon
This text of 34 Barb. 422 (Halstead v. Gordon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A voluntary assignment for the benefit of creditors, which authorizes the assignee to pay all reasonable expenses, costs, charges and commissions attending the execution thereof, with a reasonable and lawful commission for the assignee’s services, is not void. -The commissions to the assignee are to be lawful. The other commissions are for persons (auctioneers and others) employed to do the work.
It does not avoid the assignment to authorize the property to be sold at private sale.
There is no authority, in the assignment, to sell on credit. The only direction given to the assignee by the words “ as he may deem most beneficial to the interest of the creditors [424]*424is as to the mode of selling; viz. either at public or private sale, not to selling on credit.
Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered; costs to abide the event.
Clerke, Ingraham and Leonard, Justices.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 Barb. 422, 1861 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halstead-v-gordon-nysupct-1861.