Halstead v. Florence Citrus Growers Ass'n

156 So. 395, 115 Fla. 618, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1647
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 25, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 156 So. 395 (Halstead v. Florence Citrus Growers Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Halstead v. Florence Citrus Growers Ass'n, 156 So. 395, 115 Fla. 618, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1647 (Fla. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal before us is from a final decree in favor of the defendants in the court below, the appellees here.

This is the second appearance of this case in this court. See Halstead v. Florence Citrus Growers Association, 104 Fla. 21, 139 Sou. 132. The law of the case was enunciated in that opinion.

The controlling question in the case as it is now presented is whether or not the findings of the chancellor are supported by the evidence when taken in connection with the law as to the burden of proof as expressed in our former opinion cited above.

After a full consideration of the record and briefs submitted thereon and after argument of counsel, we can not say that it is made clearly to appear that the chancellor erred in his findings.

Therefore, the decree should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

*619 Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur. Terrell, J., concurs in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Halstead v. Florence Citrus Growers Assn.
139 So. 132 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 So. 395, 115 Fla. 618, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halstead-v-florence-citrus-growers-assn-fla-1934.