Halstead v. Connecticut Electrotype Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Halstead v. Connecticut Electrotype Co.

254 A.D. 654, 4 N.Y.S.2d 179, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6907

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 1, 1938·Published

Opinion

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified by limiting the books, records and documents to be produced under the second subdivision numbered “ 6 ” of the notice of motion, to such papers relating to the corporate set up and inter-relation of the two defendants as may appear relevant to the matters upon which the examination is to be had, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified by limiting the books, records and documents to be produced under the second subdivision numbered “ 6 ” of the notice of motion, to such papers relating to the corporate set up and inter-relation of the two defendants as may appear relevant to the matters upon which the examination is to be had, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Halstead v. Connecticut Electrotype Co., 254 A.D. 654, 4 N.Y.S.2d 179, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

254 A.D. 654 (Halstead v. Connecticut Electrotype Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.