Halsey v. Mott

Connecticut Superior Court

Halsey v. Mott

1 Kirby 277

DecidedMarch 15, 1787

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Kirby 277 (Halsey v. Mott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Halsey v. Mott, 1 Kirby 277 (Colo. Ct. App. 1787).

Pincite

Opinion

By the whole Court.

We are not, after verdict, to go into the evidence at large. From the plaintiff’s account on file, there appears a balance in his favor, larger than the jury have found, exclusive of the article mentioned in the motion; [278]*278and with, regard to tbat charge, thought it would be inadmissible as for the fee, or real estate, yet it might be good for the works, or for the use of the works.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the whole Court.

We are not, after verdict, to go into the evidence at large. From the plaintiff’s account on file, there appears a balance in his favor, larger than the jury have found, exclusive of the article mentioned in the motion; [278]*278and with, regard to tbat charge, thought it would be inadmissible as for the fee, or real estate, yet it might be good for the works, or for the use of the works.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Kirby 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halsey-v-mott-connsuperct-1787.