Halsey v. Mott

Connecticut Superior Court

Halsey v. Mott

1 Kirby 277

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided March 15, 1787·Published

Opinion

By the whole Court.

We are not, after verdict, to go into the evidence at large. From the plaintiff’s account on file, there appears a balance in his favor, larger than the jury have found, exclusive of the article mentioned in the motion; [278] and with, regard to tbat charge, thought it would be inadmissible as for the fee, or real estate, yet it might be good for the works, or for the use of the works.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the whole Court.

We are not, after verdict, to go into the evidence at large. From the plaintiff’s account on file, there appears a balance in his favor, larger than the jury have found, exclusive of the article mentioned in the motion; [278] and with, regard to tbat charge, thought it would be inadmissible as for the fee, or real estate, yet it might be good for the works, or for the use of the works.

Halsey v. Mott, 1 Kirby 277 (Colo. Ct. App. 1787).

Pincite

1 Kirby 277 (Halsey v. Mott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.