Halsey Import Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Halsey Import Co. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 490

United States Customs Court·Decided November 13, 1957·No. No. 61342; protest 294298-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, the collector’s amended memorandum was received in evidence, reading as follows: "Following Appraiser’s description & on appraised value as one piece the merchandise would now be properly classified at 45% under paragraph 212 of the Tariff Act of 1930.” On the record presented, the compotes were held dutiable at 45 percent under the provision in paragraph 212, as modified, supra, for decorated chinaware, not tableware, not containing 25 percent or more of calcined bone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, the collector’s amended memorandum was received in evidence, reading as follows: "Following Appraiser’s description & on appraised value as one piece the merchandise would now be properly classified at 45% under paragraph 212 of the Tariff Act of 1930.” On the record presented, the compotes were held dutiable at 45 percent under the provision in paragraph 212, as modified, supra, for decorated chinaware, not tableware, not containing 25 percent or more of calcined bone.

Halsey Import Co. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 490 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

39 Cust. Ct. 490 (Halsey Import Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.