Halsey Import Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Halsey Import Co. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 490

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedNovember 13, 1957

DocketNo. 61342; protest 294298-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 39 Cust. Ct. 490 (Halsey Import Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Halsey Import Co. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 490 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, the collector’s amended memorandum was received in evidence, reading as follows: "Following Appraiser’s description & on appraised value as one piece the merchandise would now be properly classified at 45% under paragraph 212 of the Tariff Act of 1930.” On the record presented, the compotes were held dutiable at 45 percent under the provision in paragraph 212, as modified, supra, for decorated chinaware, not tableware, not containing 25 percent or more of calcined bone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, the collector’s amended memorandum was received in evidence, reading as follows: "Following Appraiser’s description & on appraised value as one piece the merchandise would now be properly classified at 45% under paragraph 212 of the Tariff Act of 1930.” On the record presented, the compotes were held dutiable at 45 percent under the provision in paragraph 212, as modified, supra, for decorated chinaware, not tableware, not containing 25 percent or more of calcined bone.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 Cust. Ct. 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halsey-import-co-v-united-states-cusc-1957.