Halpine v. International Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Halpine v. International Railway Co.

181 A.D. 966

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 181 A.D. 966 (Halpine v. International Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Halpine v. International Railway Co., 181 A.D. 966 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with osts to appellant to abide event. Held, (l) that the verdict is against the [967]*967weight óf the evidence upon the question of the condition of the plaintiff’s heart being due to the accident; (2) that the court erred in charging the jury that there was “ no evidence that the placing of a dog or catch on the outside of the door jamb to prevent the door swinging out into the vestibule was impracticable or impossible.” All concurred; Kruse, P. J., in result upon second ground stated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with osts to appellant to abide event. Held, (l) that the verdict is against the [967]*967weight óf the evidence upon the question of the condition of the plaintiff’s heart being due to the accident; (2) that the court erred in charging the jury that there was “ no evidence that the placing of a dog or catch on the outside of the door jamb to prevent the door swinging out into the vestibule was impracticable or impossible.” All concurred; Kruse, P. J., in result upon second ground stated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 A.D. 966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halpine-v-international-railway-co-nyappdiv-1917.