Halpin v. Phœnix Insurance
This text of 4 N.Y. St. Rep. 867 (Halpin v. Phœnix Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action was brought to compel the surrender of a bond and mortgage, and its decision depended upon the determination of a question respecting the validity and force of a policy of insurance against fire issued by the defendant upon the premises covered by the mortgage.
It was the claim of the defendant that the premises became vacant and unoccupied during the period for Avhich the policy was issued, and that by virtue of a condition in the policy against such vacancy, the policy went out of force and became ineffectual and died.
The trial judge found upon evidence sufficient to sustain his finding that the premises were not vacant or unoccupied of the time of the fire, and gave judgment to the plaintiff awarding him the relief sought by his complaint.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Barnard, P. J., concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 N.Y. St. Rep. 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halpin-v-phnix-insurance-nysupct-1886.