Halpert v. Naporko

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Halpert v. Naporko

225 So. 3d 963, 2017 WL 3611793

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 23, 2017

DocketNo. 3D17-1721

StatusPublished

This text of 225 So. 3d 963 (Halpert v. Naporko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Halpert v. Naporko, 225 So. 3d 963, 2017 WL 3611793 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

SUAREZ, J.

Following review of the petition for writ of common law certiorari, it is ordered that said petition is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Specifically, the petitioner has failed to demonstrate irreparable harm. Millennium Diagnostic Imaging Ctr., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. 129 So.3d 1086, 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (“A party seeking certiorari relief must demonstrate that the trial court’s order depart[s] from the essential requirements of law, resulting in irreparable harm that cannot be adequately remedied on final appeal.”); Stockinger v. Zeilberger, 152 So.3d 71, 73 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (“The establishment of irreparable harm is a condition precedent to invoking certiorari jurisdiction.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUAREZ, J.

Following review of the petition for writ of common law certiorari, it is ordered that said petition is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Specifically, the petitioner has failed to demonstrate irreparable harm. Millennium Diagnostic Imaging Ctr., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. 129 So.3d 1086, 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (“A party seeking certiorari relief must demonstrate that the trial court’s order depart[s] from the essential requirements of law, resulting in irreparable harm that cannot be adequately remedied on final appeal.”); Stockinger v. Zeilberger, 152 So.3d 71, 73 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (“The establishment of irreparable harm is a condition precedent to invoking certiorari jurisdiction.”).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 So. 3d 963, 2017 WL 3611793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halpert-v-naporko-fladistctapp-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack