Halpern v. Niagara Frontier Transit System, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Halpern v. Niagara Frontier Transit System, Inc.

26 A.D.2d 762, 272 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3779

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 1, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 762 (Halpern v. Niagara Frontier Transit System, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Halpern v. Niagara Frontier Transit System, Inc., 26 A.D.2d 762, 272 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3779 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously modified in accordance with the Memorandum, and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: The order should be restricted to any report or reports, statement or statements, photograph or photographs made, taken, or submitted by any employee of the Niagara Frontier Transit System, Inc., to the Niagara Frontier Transit System, Inc., in the scope of his employment regarding the accident alleged in the complaint and which were obtained prior to the commencement of litigation. (Appeal from order of Brie Special Term denying motion for a protective order.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified in accordance with the Memorandum, and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: The order should be restricted to any report or reports, statement or statements, photograph or photographs made, taken, or submitted by any employee of the Niagara Frontier Transit System, Inc., to the Niagara Frontier Transit System, Inc., in the scope of his employment regarding the accident alleged in the complaint and which were obtained prior to the commencement of litigation. (Appeal from order of Brie Special Term denying motion for a protective order.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 762, 272 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halpern-v-niagara-frontier-transit-system-inc-nyappdiv-1966.