Halpern v. Lohr

D.C. Circuit

Halpern v. Lohr

166 F.2d 212, 82 U.S. App. D.C. 403

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedOctober 20, 1947

DocketNo. 9370

StatusPublished

This text of 166 F.2d 212 (Halpern v. Lohr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Halpern v. Lohr, 166 F.2d 212, 82 U.S. App. D.C. 403 (D.C. Cir. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s complaint asked for an injunction to restrain foreclosure proceedings in Maryland, for money judgments, and for incidental relief. The defendant Citizens Bank is a Maryland corporation and was not properly served with process in the District of Columbia. The complaint states no claim on which relief could be granted against the other defendants. Accordingly the District Court rightly quashed service on the Bank and dismissed the complaint as to the other defendants.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s complaint asked for an injunction to restrain foreclosure proceedings in Maryland, for money judgments, and for incidental relief. The defendant Citizens Bank is a Maryland corporation and was not properly served with process in the District of Columbia. The complaint states no claim on which relief could be granted against the other defendants. Accordingly the District Court rightly quashed service on the Bank and dismissed the complaint as to the other defendants.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 F.2d 212, 82 U.S. App. D.C. 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halpern-v-lohr-cadc-1947.