Halpern v. Koikos

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Halpern v. Koikos

255 So. 3d 535

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 31, 2018

DocketNo. 1D17-792

StatusPublished

This text of 255 So. 3d 535 (Halpern v. Koikos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Halpern v. Koikos, 255 So. 3d 535 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant challenges the injunction against domestic violence entered January 26, 2017, after the final hearing held that same date. Appellant argues that the injunction was not supported by competent substantial evidence. However, after our order allowing Appellant to supplement the record with a transcript of the hearing or stipulated statement of the evidence, he did not do so. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.200(b)(4), (f)(2). Accordingly, we must affirm. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979) ; Murphy v. Blubaugh , 43 Fla. L. Weekly D1712, 252 So.3d 809 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) ; Jackson v. Echols , 937 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ; Ricketts v. Ricketts , 790 So.2d 1265 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) ; Ain v. Ain , 778 So.2d 1029 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

AFFIRMED .

Wetherell, Bilbrey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant challenges the injunction against domestic violence entered January 26, 2017, after the final hearing held that same date. Appellant argues that the injunction was not supported by competent substantial evidence. However, after our order allowing Appellant to supplement the record with a transcript of the hearing or stipulated statement of the evidence, he did not do so. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.200(b)(4), (f)(2). Accordingly, we must affirm. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979) ; Murphy v. Blubaugh , 43 Fla. L. Weekly D1712, 252 So.3d 809 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) ; Jackson v. Echols , 937 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ; Ricketts v. Ricketts , 790 So.2d 1265 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) ; Ain v. Ain , 778 So.2d 1029 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

AFFIRMED .

Wetherell, Bilbrey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 So. 3d 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halpern-v-koikos-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack