Home/New York Court of Appeals/Halpern v. Jad Construction Corp.

Halpern v. Jad Construction Corp.

205 N.E.2d 863, 15 N.Y.2d 823, 257 N.Y.S.2d 940, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1594
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 11, 1965
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 205 N.E.2d 863 (Halpern v. Jad Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Halpern v. Jad Construction Corp., 205 N.E.2d 863, 15 N.Y.2d 823, 257 N.Y.S.2d 940, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1594 (N.Y. 1965).

Opinion

Order affirmed without costs. The complaint states no cause of action, either in negligence or breach of warranty, against defendant Firestone. However, in reaching this conclusion, we find it unnecessary to consider the question—and we reserve it for a proper case—whether an action for breach of an implied warranty may ever be brought against the manufacturer of a component part such as an automobile tire. (Cf. Goldberg v. Kollsman Instrument Corp., 12 N Y 2d 432, 437.)

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Franov v. Exxon Co.
178 A.D.2d 327 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Collins v. Uniroyal, Inc.
315 A.2d 16 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 N.E.2d 863, 15 N.Y.2d 823, 257 N.Y.S.2d 940, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halpern-v-jad-construction-corp-ny-1965.