Halpern v. Halpern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Halpern v. Halpern

264 A.D.2d 630, 696 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9273

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 23, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D.2d 630 (Halpern v. Halpern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Halpern v. Halpern, 264 A.D.2d 630, 696 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9273 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered March 23, 1998, which denied defendant’s motion to reject the report of the Special Referee and to appoint a new Referee for a new trial, and granted plaintiffs cross motion to confirm the report of the Special Referee, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The report of a Referee should be confirmed if the findings therein are supported by the record (Namer v 152-54-56 W. 15th St. Realty Corp., 108 AD2d 705). Since there is ample basis in the record for the findings of the Referee in this case, the IAS Court’s confirmation of the Referee’s findings was proper and should not be disturbed. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Wallach and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered March 23, 1998, which denied defendant’s motion to reject the report of the Special Referee and to appoint a new Referee for a new trial, and granted plaintiffs cross motion to confirm the report of the Special Referee, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The report of a Referee should be confirmed if the findings therein are supported by the record (Namer v 152-54-56 W. 15th St. Realty Corp., 108 AD2d 705). Since there is ample basis in the record for the findings of the Referee in this case, the IAS Court’s confirmation of the Referee’s findings was proper and should not be disturbed. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Wallach and Lerner, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D.2d 630, 696 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halpern-v-halpern-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack