Halpern v. Halpern

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Halpern v. Halpern

547 So. 2d 310, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1883, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4463, 1989 WL 88017

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 9, 1989

DocketNo. 88-1434

StatusPublished

This text of 547 So. 2d 310 (Halpern v. Halpern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Halpern v. Halpern, 547 So. 2d 310, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1883, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4463, 1989 WL 88017 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

GUNTHER, Judge.

We affirm in all respects except for the errors the appellee concedes the trial court committed.

Appellee concedes that a marital asset awarded to appellant was overvalued by $6,000 and that the wife retained marital assets worth $5,500 that had been omitted from the list of marital assets subject to an equitable distribution. Therefore, we reverse as to the conceded errors and remand with instructions to amend the final judgment to reflect a $6,000 decrease in the valuation of the West Broward Lago property, and to include $5,500 in furniture and jewelry to the list of marital assets. Accordingly, the trial court is instructed to reduce the award of lump sum alimony to the appellee by the sum of $5,750.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO AMEND THE FINAL JUDGMENT.

LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GUNTHER, Judge.

We affirm in all respects except for the errors the appellee concedes the trial court committed.

Appellee concedes that a marital asset awarded to appellant was overvalued by $6,000 and that the wife retained marital assets worth $5,500 that had been omitted from the list of marital assets subject to an equitable distribution. Therefore, we reverse as to the conceded errors and remand with instructions to amend the final judgment to reflect a $6,000 decrease in the valuation of the West Broward Lago property, and to include $5,500 in furniture and jewelry to the list of marital assets. Accordingly, the trial court is instructed to reduce the award of lump sum alimony to the appellee by the sum of $5,750.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO AMEND THE FINAL JUDGMENT.

LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

547 So. 2d 310, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1883, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4463, 1989 WL 88017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halpern-v-halpern-fladistctapp-1989.