Halpern, R. v. Ricoh U.S.A., Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 27, 2024·No. 263 EAL 2023 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

ROBERT N. HALPERN, ON BEHALF OF : No. 263 EAL 2023 HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY : SITUATED, :

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal Petitioner : from the Order of the Superior Court : :

v. :

: :

RICOH U.S.A., INC., :

:

Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Whether, in this case of first impression, this Court should overrule the 2001 Superior Court holding in Romeo v. Pittsburgh Associates that a deceptive omission under Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law is actionable only if a vendor had an affirmative duty to disclose a defect in a good or service.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Halpern, R. v. Ricoh U.S.A., Inc., (Pa. 2024).

Halpern, R. v. Ricoh U.S.A., Inc. (Halpern, R. v. Ricoh U.S.A., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.