Halpern, R. v. Ricoh U.S.A., Inc.
This text of Halpern, R. v. Ricoh U.S.A., Inc. (Halpern, R. v. Ricoh U.S.A., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
ROBERT N. HALPERN, ON BEHALF OF : No. 263 EAL 2023 HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY : SITUATED, : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal Petitioner : from the Order of the Superior Court : : v. : : : RICOH U.S.A., INC., : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Whether, in this case of first impression, this Court should overrule the 2001 Superior Court holding in Romeo v. Pittsburgh Associates that a deceptive omission under Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law is actionable only if a vendor had an affirmative duty to disclose a defect in a good or service.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Halpern, R. v. Ricoh U.S.A., Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halpern-r-v-ricoh-usa-inc-pa-2024.