Halpern, R. v. Ricoh U.S.A., Inc.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
ROBERT N. HALPERN, ON BEHALF OF : No. 263 EAL 2023 HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY : SITUATED, :
: Petition for Allowance of Appeal Petitioner : from the Order of the Superior Court : :
v. :
: :
RICOH U.S.A., INC., :
:
Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Whether, in this case of first impression, this Court should overrule the 2001 Superior Court holding in Romeo v. Pittsburgh Associates that a deceptive omission under Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law is actionable only if a vendor had an affirmative duty to disclose a defect in a good or service.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Halpern, R. v. Ricoh U.S.A., Inc. (Halpern, R. v. Ricoh U.S.A., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.