Halperin v. Nordic American Banking Corp.

448 So. 2d 81, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12616
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 11, 1984
DocketNo. 83-2358
StatusPublished

This text of 448 So. 2d 81 (Halperin v. Nordic American Banking Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Halperin v. Nordic American Banking Corp., 448 So. 2d 81, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12616 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Jack Halperin, appeals from an order denying his motion to quash service of process. We reverse upon authority of Stokes v. Bell, 441 So.2d 146 (Fla. 1983); Huguenor v. Huguenor, 420 So.2d 344 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); State ex rel. Cox v. Adams, 148 Fla. 426, 4 So.2d 457 (1941); Rorick v. Chancey, 130 Fla. 442, 178 So. 112 (1937), vacated on other grounds on rehearing, 142 Fla. 298, 195 So. 422 (1939).

REVERSED.

HERSEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stokes v. Bell
441 So. 2d 146 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Huguenor v. Huguenor
420 So. 2d 344 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
State Ex Rel. Cox v. Adams
4 So. 2d 457 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
Rorick v. Chancey
178 So. 112 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
448 So. 2d 81, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halperin-v-nordic-american-banking-corp-fladistctapp-1984.