Halperin v. Nordic American Banking Corp.
This text of 448 So. 2d 81 (Halperin v. Nordic American Banking Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant, Jack Halperin, appeals from an order denying his motion to quash service of process. We reverse upon authority of Stokes v. Bell, 441 So.2d 146 (Fla. 1983); Huguenor v. Huguenor, 420 So.2d 344 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); State ex rel. Cox v. Adams, 148 Fla. 426, 4 So.2d 457 (1941); Rorick v. Chancey, 130 Fla. 442, 178 So. 112 (1937), vacated on other grounds on rehearing, 142 Fla. 298, 195 So. 422 (1939).
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
448 So. 2d 81, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halperin-v-nordic-american-banking-corp-fladistctapp-1984.