Halperin v. Barashik
This text of 240 A.D. 722 (Halperin v. Barashik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion for examination of defendants before trial reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted to the extent of permitting the examination and of requiring the production of books solely for the purpose of refreshing recollection; the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Appeal from order denying motion for reargument dismissed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D. 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halperin-v-barashik-nyappdiv-1933.