Halma Investment Holdings Limited v. Juan Antonio Bonel Borssen
This text of Halma Investment Holdings Limited v. Juan Antonio Bonel Borssen (Halma Investment Holdings Limited v. Juan Antonio Bonel Borssen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
HALMA INVESTMENT CV 20-6953 DSF (Ex) HOLDINGS LIMITED, Plaintiff, Order DISMISSING Case for Lack of Subject Matter Vv. Jurisdiction JUAN ANTONIO BONEL BORSSEN, et al., Defendants.
Plaintiff is a corporation incorporated and headquartered in the United Kingdom that has sued a mix of United States, Spanish, Swedish, Luxembourgish, and Cypriot Defendants in this Court based on diversity jurisdiction. However, there is no diversity jurisdiction in a case with an alien on one side and a mix of United States citizens and aliens on the other. Craig v. Atl. Richfield Co., 19 F.3d 472, 476 (9th Cir. 1994) (“[T]he case involved a single foreign plaintiff... and numerous foreign defendants (in addition to U.S. defendants), thereby defeating diversity.”). Therefore, the case is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: October 5, 2020 A\doNe bb . Cache Dale S. Fischer United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Halma Investment Holdings Limited v. Juan Antonio Bonel Borssen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halma-investment-holdings-limited-v-juan-antonio-bonel-borssen-cacd-2020.