Hallwood Cash Register Co. v. Greenberger

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Hallwood Cash Register Co. v. Greenberger

90 N.Y.S. 361

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 90 N.Y.S. 361 (Hallwood Cash Register Co. v. Greenberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hallwood Cash Register Co. v. Greenberger, 90 N.Y.S. 361 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant in person signed the contract, and the signature does not appear to be that of an inexperienced penman. The register in question was in his place of business [362]*362at' the time. If he did not know what he was signing, that is his fault. He could write, and there is no pretense that he could not read.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant tp abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant in person signed the contract, and the signature does not appear to be that of an inexperienced penman. The register in question was in his place of business [362]*362at' the time. If he did not know what he was signing, that is his fault. He could write, and there is no pretense that he could not read.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant tp abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 N.Y.S. 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hallwood-cash-register-co-v-greenberger-nyappterm-1904.