Hallwood Cash Register Co. v. Greenberger

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Hallwood Cash Register Co. v. Greenberger

90 N.Y.S. 361

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 10, 1904·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant in person signed the contract, and the signature does not appear to be that of an inexperienced penman. The register in question was in his place of business [362]*362at' the time. If he did not know what he was signing, that is his fault. He could write, and there is no pretense that he could not read.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant tp abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant in person signed the contract, and the signature does not appear to be that of an inexperienced penman. The register in question was in his place of business [362]*362at' the time. If he did not know what he was signing, that is his fault. He could write, and there is no pretense that he could not read.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant tp abide the event.

Hallwood Cash Register Co. v. Greenberger, 90 N.Y.S. 361 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

90 N.Y.S. 361 (Hallwood Cash Register Co. v. Greenberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.