Halls v. Van Buren
This text of 24 A.D.2d 693 (Halls v. Van Buren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It was correctly held at Special Term that under the statutory provision that, in lieu of any other prescribed residency requirement, the board of trustees of a village may provide that any appointed village officer may reside within the town in which the village is located (see Village Law, § 4-404, subd. 2, and former § 43, subd. 1), affirmative and specific action by the board is contemplated and that the more appointment of petitioner, a resident of the town but not of the village, did not have that effect (Opinion, 46 Misc 2d 703.) Judgment affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 A.D.2d 693, 261 N.Y.S.2d 349, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halls-v-van-buren-nyappdiv-1965.