Hall's Appeal

1 Pennyp. 223
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 8, 1881
DocketNo. 147
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Pennyp. 223 (Hall's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hall's Appeal, 1 Pennyp. 223 (Pa. 1881).

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The only exception relied on in the oral argument was as to the lien of the Welsh judgment. We see no irregularity of that judgment. It is only when the defendant dies pending the suit, that it is necessary to bring in the executor by a scire facias, and have a judgment of the Court making him a party. The suggestion of the death of the defendant in the praecipe for the writ, when the defendant is dead when it issues, is entirely regular. It is, besides, very clear that Dorey, the executor of Fleming, was, under the will, the terre tenant of the land, and notice to him was all that was necessary to continue the lien. It was altogether unnecessary to make the widow and heirs parties. We are of opinion, therefore, that the decree of the Court below was entirely right.

Decree affirmed, and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Specht v. Sipe
15 Pa. Super. 207 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Pennyp. 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halls-appeal-pa-1881.