Hallowell v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Hallowell v. United States

258 F. 237, 169 C.C.A. 303, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1197

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 6, 1919

DocketNo. 3141

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 258 F. 237 (Hallowell v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hallowell v. United States, 258 F. 237, 169 C.C.A. 303, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1197 (9th Cir. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A rehearing of the above-entitled cause was ordered, for the reason that one of the judges before whom the argument was made was disqualified, in that he had signed and allowed the bill of exceptions. Upon the rehearing of the case no reason is perceived for departing from the decision heretofore rendered by this court. All of the points in the case have been covered by the opinion heretofore filed.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A rehearing of the above-entitled cause was ordered, for the reason that one of the judges before whom the argument was made was disqualified, in that he had signed and allowed the bill of exceptions. Upon the rehearing of the case no reason is perceived for departing from the decision heretofore rendered by this court. All of the points in the case have been covered by the opinion heretofore filed.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 F. 237, 169 C.C.A. 303, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hallowell-v-united-states-ca9-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack