Halloway v. Davis

Ohio Supreme Court

Halloway v. Davis

1 Wright 460, 1 Ohio Ch. 460

DecidedOctober 15, 1833

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Wright 460 (Halloway v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Halloway v. Davis, 1 Wright 460, 1 Ohio Ch. 460 (Ohio 1833).

Pincite

Opinion

WOOD, J.

The contract is competent evidence. If money ha? been paid on it, and it has been rescinded, or put an end to, or the defendant has refused to comply with it, on either being shown,, the money may he recovered hack in this form; 5 O. 352. Whether the plaintiff will establish such a case we will not now undertake to say; but the evidence offered is a link in a chain of such evi dence.

,- There was a verdict and judgment for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOOD, J.

The contract is competent evidence. If money ha? been paid on it, and it has been rescinded, or put an end to, or the defendant has refused to comply with it, on either being shown,, the money may he recovered hack in this form; 5 O. 352. Whether the plaintiff will establish such a case we will not now undertake to say; but the evidence offered is a link in a chain of such evi dence.

,- There was a verdict and judgment for the defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Wright 460, 1 Ohio Ch. 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halloway-v-davis-ohio-1833.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack