Halloran v. Parke, Davis & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Halloran v. Parke, Davis & Co.

245 A.D. 727

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1935

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 245 A.D. 727 (Halloran v. Parke, Davis & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Halloran v. Parke, Davis & Co., 245 A.D. 727 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

This action is to recover damages for the loss of sight of plaintiff’s left eye, as a result of the explosion of a certain drug or pharmaceutical preparation manufactured by defendant. The basis of plaintiff’s claim is that defendant was negligent, not in the manufacture of the article, but in the failure to give warning as to its dangers and instructions as to its proper use. Judgment in favor of plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This action is to recover damages for the loss of sight of plaintiff’s left eye, as a result of the explosion of a certain drug or pharmaceutical preparation manufactured by defendant. The basis of plaintiff’s claim is that defendant was negligent, not in the manufacture of the article, but in the failure to give warning as to its dangers and instructions as to its proper use. Judgment in favor of plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.D. 727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halloran-v-parke-davis-co-nyappdiv-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack