Halloran v. N. & C. Contracting Co.
223 A.D. 721
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1928·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Upon reargument, order granting defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict and grant a new trial affirmed, with costs. We are of opinion that under section 861 of the Penal Law, the oral contract set forth in the complaint is void. Rich, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., not voting; Lazansky, P. J., dissents, being of opinion that the section of the Penal Law in question is unconstitutional, and still holding to his views expressed in the former decision of this court,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Halloran v. N. & C. Contracting Co., 223 A.D. 721 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).
223 A.D. 721 (Halloran v. N. & C. Contracting Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sardone v. Joseph Diamond Holding Co.
244 A.D. 300 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)