Halloran v. Kirwan

269 N.E.2d 403, 28 N.Y.2d 689, 320 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1478
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 3, 1971·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

Order reversed, with costs, and determination of respondent annulled. Lacking in this case is definitive proof that petitioner intended to commit larceny and, accordingly, the order appealed from should be reversed and respondent’s determination annulled on the ground that there is no substantial evidence in the record to support it.

Concur: Chief Judge Fulo and Judges Burke, Bergan and Gtibson. Judge Scileppi dissents and votes to modify by remitting matter to Superintendent of State Police for reconsideration and reduction of penalty of dismissal upon the ground that penalty imposed was grossly excessive. Judge Breitel dissents and votes to affirm in the following opinion in which Judge Jasen concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Halloran v. Kirwan, 269 N.E.2d 403, 28 N.Y.2d 689, 320 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1478 (N.Y. 1971).

269 N.E.2d 403 (Halloran v. Kirwan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of HDV Manhattan, LLC v. Tax Appeals Trib. of The State of New York
2017 NY Slip Op 8559 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Sedita v. Kissinger
66 A.D.2d 357 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Harris v. Mechanicville Central School District
86 Misc. 144 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)
People v. Belkota
50 A.D.2d 118 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)