Hallock v. Erie Railroad
164 A.D. 911
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 15, 1914
StatusPublished
This text of 164 A.D. 911 (Hallock v. Erie Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hallock v. Erie Railroad, 164 A.D. 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Foote, J., who dissented upon the ground that it was error to refuse defendant’s requests to charge on the question of plaintiff’s assumption of the risk. (See Seaboard Air Line v. Horton, 238 U. S. 492.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
164 A.D. 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hallock-v-erie-railroad-nyappdiv-1914.