Hallman v. State

698 S.W.2d 803, 287 Ark. 383
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided November 25, 1985·No. CR 85-153·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Attorney J.F. Atkinson, Jr., moves this court to accept a brief on behalf of his client, Michael Hallman. The brief was due on November 1,1985, and was tendered seven days late. We accept the brief because we do not wish the appellant to suffer loss of this criminal appeal because of Mr. Atkinson’s negligence. The only excuse offered is that the record is large. Mr. Atkinson notes in his motion that he is a court appointed attorney in this case. We wish particularly to emphasize that the professional obligations of attorneys appointed by the court are the same as those of all others representing the accused in criminal cases.

Motion granted.

Purtle, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hallman v. State, 698 S.W.2d 803, 287 Ark. 383 (Ark. 1985).

698 S.W.2d 803 (Hallman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stewart v. State
889 S.W.2d 771 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1995)
Betts v. State
874 S.W.2d 375 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1994)