Hallman v. State

698 S.W.2d 803, 287 Ark. 383
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 25, 1985
DocketCR 85-153
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 698 S.W.2d 803 (Hallman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hallman v. State, 698 S.W.2d 803, 287 Ark. 383 (Ark. 1985).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Attorney J.F. Atkinson, Jr., moves this court to accept a brief on behalf of his client, Michael Hallman. The brief was due on November 1,1985, and was tendered seven days late. We accept the brief because we do not wish the appellant to suffer loss of this criminal appeal because of Mr. Atkinson’s negligence. The only excuse offered is that the record is large. Mr. Atkinson notes in his motion that he is a court appointed attorney in this case. We wish particularly to emphasize that the professional obligations of attorneys appointed by the court are the same as those of all others representing the accused in criminal cases.

Motion granted.

Purtle, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stewart v. State
889 S.W.2d 771 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1995)
Betts v. State
874 S.W.2d 375 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
698 S.W.2d 803, 287 Ark. 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hallman-v-state-ark-1985.