Hallman v. Hallman

Supreme Court of Delaware

Hallman v. Hallman

215 A.2d 427, 59 Del. 145, 9 Storey 145, 1965 Del. LEXIS 192

CourtSupreme Court of Delaware

DecidedNovember 23, 1965

Docket22, 1964

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 215 A.2d 427 (Hallman v. Hallman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hallman v. Hallman, 215 A.2d 427, 59 Del. 145, 9 Storey 145, 1965 Del. LEXIS 192 (Del. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial of a husband’s complaint for divorce upon the ground of mutual voluntary separation of husband and wife with no prospect of reconciliation (13 Del.C. Sec. 1522(11). The trial judge held that the husband had failed by a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the separation was mutually voluntary. We have examined the record and are of the opinion that the husband’s evidence was not so clearly sufficient in support of his case that the trial judge’s conclusions should be disturbed.

*146 The judgment below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial of a husband’s complaint for divorce upon the ground of mutual voluntary separation of husband and wife with no prospect of reconciliation (13 Del.C. Sec. 1522(11). The trial judge held that the husband had failed by a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the separation was mutually voluntary. We have examined the record and are of the opinion that the husband’s evidence was not so clearly sufficient in support of his case that the trial judge’s conclusions should be disturbed.

*146 The judgment below is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 A.2d 427, 59 Del. 145, 9 Storey 145, 1965 Del. LEXIS 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hallman-v-hallman-del-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack