Hallman v. City of New York

47 A.D.2d 896, 367 N.Y.S.2d 271, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9311
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 29, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 47 A.D.2d 896 (Hallman v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hallman v. City of New York, 47 A.D.2d 896, 367 N.Y.S.2d 271, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9311 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on April 8, 1974, setting aside the jury’s verdict in favor of plaintiff and dismissing the complaint for failure to make out a prima facie case, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, verdict reinstated, and a new trial directed on the issue of damages, with $60 costs and disbursements to abide the event, unless the plaintiff within 20 days of service upon her by defendant of a copy of the order entered hereon, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the reinstated verdict to $225,000 and to the entry of a judgment in accordance therewith. In such event, the judgment is reversed, on the law and on the facts, and vacated, and judgment directed in favor of plaintiff against defendant in the reduced amount of $225,000, without costs and without disbursements. The trial court, in setting aside the verdict as against the weight of the credible evidence, usurped the jury’s right to resolve the [897]*897limited (by stipulation) question of fact presented, to wit: whether New York City Police Officer Southerland shot the decedent on August 10, 1971. Such error was compounded by the court’s dismissal of the complaint for failure to prove a prima facie case. Such dismissal, in the face of eyewitness testimony that Patrolman Southerland fired the fatal shot, cannot be justified. However, a judgment exceeding the amount indicated is not warranted on this record. Concur — Murphy, J. P., Lupiano, Capozzoli, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. City of New York
48 A.D.2d 611 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 A.D.2d 896, 367 N.Y.S.2d 271, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hallman-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1975.