Hallinan v. Skillen

New York Court of Appeals

Hallinan v. Skillen

171 N.E. 777, 253 N.Y. 550, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 915

New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 18, 1930·Published

Opinion

Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed on the authority of Vincent v. Rix (248 N. Y. 76) and judgment directed in favor of the appellants Harry Redmond Skillen and George W. Skillen decreeing them to be the owners of the real property in question, subject to the plaintiff’s lien thereon for $7,000, and directing the plaintiffs to account for the rents and profits since the death of Louisa C. Fox, the judgment to contain the same provisions as to costs and allowances as the judgment appealed from; no opinion.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed on the authority of Vincent v. Rix (248 N. Y. 76) and judgment directed in favor of the appellants Harry Redmond Skillen and George W. Skillen decreeing them to be the owners of the real property in question, subject to the plaintiff’s lien thereon for $7,000, and directing the plaintiffs to account for the rents and profits since the death of Louisa C. Fox, the judgment to contain the same provisions as to costs and allowances as the judgment appealed from; no opinion.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.

Hallinan v. Skillen, 171 N.E. 777, 253 N.Y. 550, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 915 (N.Y. 1930).

Pincite

171 N.E. 777 (Hallinan v. Skillen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related