Hallihan v. Corporation of Washington

11 F. Cas. 292, 4 D.C. 304, 4 Cranch 304

This text of 11 F. Cas. 292 (Hallihan v. Corporation of Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hallihan v. Corporation of Washington, 11 F. Cas. 292, 4 D.C. 304, 4 Cranch 304 (circtddc 1833).

Opinion

The Court

(nem. con.,

but Thruston, J., doubting,)

admitted the evidence and told the jury, that if they should be satisfied by the evidence that the plaintiff had performed the contract on his part, he had a right to recover in this action for the balance due to him, although there was no evidence of a demand or tender of stock.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 F. Cas. 292, 4 D.C. 304, 4 Cranch 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hallihan-v-corporation-of-washington-circtddc-1833.