Halligan v. Porte
215 A.D. 841
Opinion
Orders reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and undertaking canceled and lis pendens restored. The learned court below, under the complaint disclosed here, was without power to make the orders appealed from. (Mills v. Bliss, 55 N. Y. 139; Wolinsky v. Okun, 111 App. Div. 536; Tishman v. Acritelli, Id. 237.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Halligan v. Porte, 215 A.D. 841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).
215 A.D. 841 (Halligan v. Porte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mills v. . Bliss
55 N.Y. 139 (New York Court of Appeals, 1873)
Wolinsky v. Okun
111 A.D. 536 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)