Halligan v. Porte
This text of 215 A.D. 841 (Halligan v. Porte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Orders reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and undertaking canceled and lis pendens restored. The learned court below, under the complaint disclosed here, was without power to make the orders appealed from. (Mills v. Bliss, 55 N. Y. 139; Wolinsky v. Okun, 111 App. Div. 536; Tishman v. Acritelli, Id. 237.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
215 A.D. 841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halligan-v-porte-nyappdiv-1926.