Halligan v. Porte

215 A.D. 841

This text of 215 A.D. 841 (Halligan v. Porte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Halligan v. Porte, 215 A.D. 841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Orders reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and undertaking canceled and lis pendens restored. The learned court below, under the complaint disclosed here, was without power to make the orders appealed from. (Mills v. Bliss, 55 N. Y. 139; Wolinsky v. Okun, 111 App. Div. 536; Tishman v. Acritelli, Id. 237.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mills v. . Bliss
55 N.Y. 139 (New York Court of Appeals, 1873)
Wolinsky v. Okun
111 A.D. 536 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 A.D. 841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halligan-v-porte-nyappdiv-1926.