Halliburton v. Collier
This text of 39 S.E.2d 698 (Halliburton v. Collier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment in this case was for an abatement in the contract price for the purchase of described realty. It appears that the parties by agreement before trial disposed of the injunctive feature, and that no equitable relief was granted. Held: The judgment rendered was not in a suit “respecting title to land” within the provisions of art. 6, sec. 2, par. 4 of the Constitution of 1945. Such judgment was in a suit essentially an action at law for the recovery of the value of land. Grobli v. Foreman, 171 Ga. 712 (156 S. E. 622) ; Farkas v. Stephens, 181 Ga. 669 (183 S. E. 796) ; Henley v. Colonial Stages, 184 Ga. 445 (191 S. E. 445); Gilbert Hotel v. Black, 192 Ga. 643 (16 S. E. 2d, 435). *341 .It therefore appears that all questions for decision are properly within the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals and not the Supreme Court.
Transferred to the Court of Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 S.E.2d 698, 201 Ga. 340, 1946 Ga. LEXIS 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halliburton-v-collier-ga-1946.