Halliburton Energy Services v. Daniel Silva

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 7, 2005
Docket13-04-00677-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Halliburton Energy Services v. Daniel Silva (Halliburton Energy Services v. Daniel Silva) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Halliburton Energy Services v. Daniel Silva, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-04-677-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________________


HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

D/B/A HALLIBURTON F/K/A HALLIBURTON

LOGGING SERVICES, INC. AND HLS (INTL)

HOLDINGS, INC.,                                                              Appellant,


v.


DANIEL SILVA,                                                                  Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________


On appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellant, HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC. D/B/A HALLIBURTON F/K/A HALLIBURTON LOGGING SERVICES, INC. AND HLS (INTL) HOLDINGS, INC., attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by County Court at Law No. 1 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number 43,728-A. After the clerk’s record was received, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, the parties state that they have reached a final settlement agreement in this case. The parties request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

         The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

                                                               PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 7th day of April, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Halliburton Energy Services v. Daniel Silva, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halliburton-energy-services-v-daniel-silva-texapp-2005.