Halliburton Co. v. Administrative Review Board

596 F. App'x 340
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 11, 2015
Docket13-60323
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 596 F. App'x 340 (Halliburton Co. v. Administrative Review Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Halliburton Co. v. Administrative Review Board, 596 F. App'x 340 (5th Cir. 2015).

Opinions

JAMES L. DENNIS, District Judge.

ORDER:

A member of the court in active service having requested a poll on the reconsideration of this cause en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), rehearing en banc is DENIED.

In the en banc poll, seven judges voted in favor of rehearing (Judges Jolly, Davis, Jones, Smith, Clement, Owen, and Elrod), and eight judges voted against (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Dennis, Prado, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, and Costa).

ENTERED FOR THE COURT:

James L. Dennis United States Circuit Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meyer v. State
426 P.3d 89 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2018)
Wheat v. Florida Parish Juvenile Justice Commission
811 F.3d 702 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
596 F. App'x 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halliburton-co-v-administrative-review-board-ca5-2015.