Hallford v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Eleventh Circuit

Hallford v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

158 F. App'x 198

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedNovember 29, 2005

DocketNo. 05-12156; D.C. Docket No. 04-00109-CV-3-RV-MD

StatusPublished

This text of 158 F. App'x 198 (Hallford v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hallford v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 158 F. App'x 198 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Wendy L. Hallford appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Metropolitan Life Insurance Company in her Employee Retiremerit Income Security Act of 1974 action. 29 U.S.C. § 1132. The district court concluded the denial of long-term disability benefits to Hallford was not arbitrary and capricious. After reviewing the record, as well as the parties’ briefs, we agree and affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s well-reasoned order of March 11, 2005.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Wendy L. Hallford appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Metropolitan Life Insurance Company in her Employee Retiremerit Income Security Act of 1974 action. 29 U.S.C. § 1132. The district court concluded the denial of long-term disability benefits to Hallford was not arbitrary and capricious. After reviewing the record, as well as the parties’ briefs, we agree and affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s well-reasoned order of March 11, 2005.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 F. App'x 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hallford-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-ca11-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack