Hallett v. Westover Arms Apt. Hotel

Supreme Court of Florida

Hallett v. Westover Arms Apt. Hotel

168 So. 2d 544

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedOctober 21, 1964

DocketNo. 33245

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 168 So. 2d 544 (Hallett v. Westover Arms Apt. Hotel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hallett v. Westover Arms Apt. Hotel, 168 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 1964).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on petition for writ of certiorari upon the transcript of record and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties to review the order of the Florida Industrial Commission in said cause, bearing date January 2, 1964, and the petitioner having failed to show that the essential requirements of law have been violated, it is ordered that said petition be and the same is hereby denied.

ROBERTS, CALDWELL, ERVIN and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., concur. DREW, C. J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on petition for writ of certiorari upon the transcript of record and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties to review the order of the Florida Industrial Commission in said cause, bearing date January 2, 1964, and the petitioner having failed to show that the essential requirements of law have been violated, it is ordered that said petition be and the same is hereby denied.

ROBERTS, CALDWELL, ERVIN and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., concur. DREW, C. J., dissents with opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 So. 2d 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hallett-v-westover-arms-apt-hotel-fla-1964.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack