Hallett v. Slidell

New York Supreme Court

Hallett v. Slidell

11 Johns. 56

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1814

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 11 Johns. 56 (Hallett v. Slidell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hallett v. Slidell, 11 Johns. 56 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1814).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

According to Long v. Jackson, (2 Wils. 8.) the plaintiffs were authorized to introduce into their replication matter in explanation of, or to fortify, their declaration, without incurring the charge of a departure; and as they introduced new matter, to wit, the course and practice of the court as to appearance, the conclusion with a verification was proper, and the judgment below must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed'.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

According to Long v. Jackson, (2 Wils. 8.) the plaintiffs were authorized to introduce into their replication matter in explanation of, or to fortify, their declaration, without incurring the charge of a departure; and as they introduced new matter, to wit, the course and practice of the court as to appearance, the conclusion with a verification was proper, and the judgment below must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed'.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Johns. 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hallett-v-slidell-nysupct-1814.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack