Halleran v. Manzione

257 A.D. 1003, 14 N.Y.S.2d 488, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8882
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Halleran v. Manzione. Read the opinion of the Court — 257 A.D. 852

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. [See ante, p. 852.] The following questions are certified:

1. Is the first “ separate defense ” sufficient in law to constitute a defense to the action?

2. Is the second “ separate defense ” sufficient in law to constitute a defense to the action?

3. Is the third “ separate defense ” sufficient in law to constitute a defense to the action?

4. Is the fourth “ separate defense ” (paragraph tenth thereof having been eliminated by the order of the Appellate Division) sufficient in law to constitute a defense to the action?

5. Is the fifth “ separate defense ” sufficient in law to constitute a defense to the action?

6. Is the sixth “ separate defense ” sufficient in law to constitute a partial defense to the action?

Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Halleran v. Manzione, 257 A.D. 1003, 14 N.Y.S.2d 488, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

257 A.D. 1003 (Halleran v. Manzione) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.