Hallenbeck v. Griffith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hallenbeck v. Griffith

232 A.D. 785

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1931

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 232 A.D. 785 (Hallenbeck v. Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hallenbeck v. Griffith, 232 A.D. 785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Hill, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and for dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the finding of the jury establishes the defendant had an equitable lien on plaintiff’s interest in the real estate sought to be partitioned. (McGillis v. McGillis, 154 N. Y. 532; Leary v. Corvin, 181 id. 222; Sinclair v. Purdy, 235 id. 245.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Hill, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and for dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the finding of the jury establishes the defendant had an equitable lien on plaintiff’s interest in the real estate sought to be partitioned. (McGillis v. McGillis, 154 N. Y. 532; Leary v. Corvin, 181 id. 222; Sinclair v. Purdy, 235 id. 245.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 A.D. 785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hallenbeck-v-griffith-nyappdiv-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack