Hallenbeck v. Griffith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hallenbeck v. Griffith

232 A.D. 785

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1931·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Hill, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and for dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the finding of the jury establishes the defendant had an equitable lien on plaintiff’s interest in the real estate sought to be partitioned. (McGillis v. McGillis, 154 N. Y. 532; Leary v. Corvin, 181 id. 222; Sinclair v. Purdy, 235 id. 245.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Hill, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and for dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the finding of the jury establishes the defendant had an equitable lien on plaintiff’s interest in the real estate sought to be partitioned. (McGillis v. McGillis, 154 N. Y. 532; Leary v. Corvin, 181 id. 222; Sinclair v. Purdy, 235 id. 245.)

Hallenbeck v. Griffith, 232 A.D. 785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

232 A.D. 785 (Hallenbeck v. Griffith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related